Mentoring: What You Should Know

You probably have heard of people asking for mentorship, or you have asked someone to be your mentor. This mentorship phenomenon is popular, but not many understand how to navigate it professionally. We have provided an outline in this article, which explains the mentor selection process, the mentoring process and common challenges that professionals need to look out for. Before we proceed, we must make a distinction between mentorship and mentoring. Mentorship appreciates the existing relationship between the people involved, while mentoring tries to mirror the important fact that it is a process.

Mentoring: What is it?

Mentoring refers to relationships that exists between two people (typically between a mentor and mentee), with the latter acting as an authority and the former taking the role of a student. But that is not all. Every mentoring relationship has an objective. But before we discuss the objectives, lets share an idea of what mentoring relationships entail using an acronym developed by  Beverly Kaye and Sharon Jordan-Evans

M= Model
E=. Encouragement
N=. Nurture
T=. Teacher
O=. Organization
R=   Reality
 
Back to the objectives, the most common objectives of such relationships are;

1. Networking, where the mentor provides access for the mentee

2. Career development: The mentor and the mentee work together to ensure that the mentee chart the right course in the career.

3. Capacity development: Many people struggle to acquire some difficult technical or soft skills such as machine learning or leadership respectively. This relationship helps flatten the learning curve and limit unnecessary information gathering.

4. Mentoring relationships could also take the form of sponsorship where the mentor takes his mentee under his/her wings and helps get through the vagaries of organizational life. The mentor practically sponsors the promotions and helps the mentee rise through to mid-management level by pulling stops and making calls.

5. Organizations also have embedded mentoring programs to help employees get by easily with the culture and processes of organizations. These sort of mentoring programs are designed to help develop and retain talent. Thus, mentoring programs are done with the goal of ensuring the best employees don’t leave, even as research by Harvard shows that employees who have mentorship tend to do better in terms of performance, even as they stay longer in the organization. This is what the Leader-Member Theory (LMX) characterizes as out-group and in-group, where employees who are taken in confidence by leaders tend to get more responsibility and develop more competence and confidence in the process.

The challenge however that, not all employees  take advantage of such mentoring programs because of their temperament in some cases and ignorance in other cases. In some cases, they are just carefree.

Another consideration in the mentorship debate will be that the need or compulsion for mentoring is not as established as it appears in many countries. It is one of those tools that go quietly without its significance being obvious, sadly. Mentorship can help achieve many things, such as those included above and other things such as reducing the gap for managerial talent as well as reducing asymmetries that disable organizations from harnessing the talent of employees. Our point is that it is often an understated tool.

While we have highlighted the various objectives of mentoring and its significance it is important to realize that mentors, which are the central element of mentoring relationships need to be selected carefully, and the mentor selection process is described below.

Mentor Selection

The mentor selection process follows the following order;

1. Defining a Need
2. Commitment Assessment
3. Mentor Selection
4. Feedback

1. Defining a Need

Here the need or desired outcome is determined. The desired outcome is usually based on professional development, networking, information and continuous clarification of processes, constructive feedback and support.

The need of the relationship has to be very clear.

2. Assessing Commitment

Both parties have to be. clear on the amount of time that the mentor can invest, and how the process will be ordered. Will the mentor be available to meet twice weekly or monthly. Which platforms will be used? Physical or virtual and other considerations.

It is also important to note that scholars have a consensus that mentoring relationships last for an average of 3 years. But it can be shorter or longer in some cases. This also has to be projected.


3. Mentor Selection

This is where the mentee conducts a values and capacity validation test. The mentor must be confirmed to be able to provide support for the sort of need the mentee wants to fulfill. And values of the mentor must be clarified to see if they are not at variance with that of the mentee, albeit significantly.


4. Feedback.

The quality of the relationship must be evaluated from time to time. Feedback on development and gaps should be identified and discussed with the way forward. Milestones should be evaluated and as goals are achieved, the mentoring relationship can be wound down.

The mentor selection process has been discussed, where the need for alignment of values, establishment of needs and feedback has been highlighted. It is at this point we shed light on the mentoring process.

Mentoring Process

The mentor and mentee relationship is initiated and run based on certain defined phases. These phases include; Start-up, Cultivation and Closing Phase.

1. Start-up Phase

In this phase, the parties (mentor and mentee) establish trust, clarify expectations and agree to confidentiality. Ground rules for meetings and frequency of interaction is established.

This phase is also characterized by authenticity and frankness, giving and receiving difficult feedback and honoring of commitments.

2. Cultivation

The delivery on objectives of the mentoring happens here. The mentor starts fulfilling the needs of the mentorship by sharing information, setting milestones and guiding on how to achieve these. The mentee shares feedback and the relationship continues in the task-feedback loop.

3. Closing

The closing phase happens when the needs of the mentoring engagement have been met. In some cases, a great part of the needs have been met, while the mentor is confident that the mentee now has the capacity to do things on their own.

It is important to note not all mentorship programs or arrangements close. Some evolve into a partnership where the mentor starts entrusting the mentee with his or her professional relationships through referrals or what we call confidence engagement. A confidence engagement is a situation where you get referred manage projects based on your soft skills such as leadership, decision making and confidence you have gained as a result of your mentorship relationship. 

It is important at this juncture to mention that mentorship also has its downsides. There are common mentorship challenges identified by the author of No Asshole Rule- Professor Robert Sutton.

The challenges are discussed below;

1. Straying from the mentor’s path:

The truth is that mentors are not immune from bias. You got a job offer in China, but your mentor turned down a similar offer many years ago due to some reasons. Thus, he says you should not go for a similar reason. What if things have changed?

2. Selfish Reasons: If you are useful for your mentor in certain ways, there is a tendency for them to want you to remain in that frame. They may find any growth and alternative path outside what you do for  them uncomfortable.

3. Risk Appetite:

Do you have a greater or lower appetite  for risk than your mentor? There is a tendency for a high risk appetite mentor to ask you to take more risk, when you are not ready for that. Then a low risk mentor type will be scared or worried that you are taking on risk, when that may just be what you need.


4. Reverse Mentoring:

Situations arise where people in a position of power or authority like your mentor have reduced self-awareness. People in a subordinate position tend to know more about people in power than the people in power know more about themselves!

This piece on mentoring was inspired by the promises of mentoring. Mentoring provides people with the bright networks, information, timely career advice for career development and it helps build leaders. It also has its downsides as highlighted.

Look out for more on our talen